College football eligibility just keeps getting more tangled, especially for former junior college (JUCO) athletes. The NCAA’s recent decisions—think the Diego Pavia case—have left a lot of players unsure about where they stand.
Let’s dig into the mess of NCAA eligibility rules. Players like Kaedin Robinson are fighting for another year to play, and honestly, it’s rough.
Table of Contents
Find the best accommodations
Check availability at 5* hotels, guest houses and apartments rated "superb" or "exceptional" by visitors just like you.
NO RESERVATION FEES
CHECK AVAILABILITY FOR YOUR DATES HERE
The Diego Pavia Ruling and Its Impact
Back in December, after a federal judge ruled in the Diego Pavia case, the NCAA put out a blanket waiver. Supposedly, this meant JUCO players whose eligibility expired would get another season. But as usual, things didn’t go as planned.
Take Kaedin Robinson, for example. He was a star wide receiver at Appalachian State, jumped into the transfer portal, and committed to UCLA. Then, out of nowhere, the NCAA said he couldn’t play after all.
The Five-Year Eligibility Clock
The real sticking point is the NCAA’s five-year eligibility clock. Even with the new waiver, players have to finish their careers within this window.
Robinson started at a JUCO in 2019. Because of that, he’d be playing a sixth year in 2025, which the NCAA doesn’t allow. The 2020 COVID season, which was free for everyone, just makes the math messier.
Legal Battles and Waiver Appeals
Robinson’s lawyer, Darren Heitner, says a lawsuit might be next if the NCAA doesn’t change its mind. He’s not alone—other players like South Carolina running back Rahsul Faison and Baylor wide receiver Ashtyn Hawkins are also stuck in this waiver mess.
They’re all hoping the NCAA will finally say yes, but nobody knows for sure.
Recent Court Rulings
Court decisions have been all over the place. In New Jersey, a judge gave Rutgers safety Jett Elad a preliminary injunction, saying his JUCO season shouldn’t count against the five-year clock.
That decision could set a big precedent, but it’s not a sure thing for everyone else.
The Broader Implications
This isn’t just about a few players. These rulings show how inconsistent and confusing the NCAA’s eligibility rules really are.
Wisconsin cornerback Nyzier Fourqurean managed to convince the NCAA that his Division II season shouldn’t count. But plenty of others have lost their cases in states like North Carolina, Kansas, and Tennessee.
Coaches and Schools Weigh In
Coaches and schools are frustrated, too. South Carolina coach Shane Beamer has been vocal about the never-ending waiver process for Faison.
Nevada wide receiver Cortez Braham Jr. is still stuck in the transfer portal with nowhere to go, since schools don’t know if he’s eligible. His situation is even more complicated because he says his second JUCO season shouldn’t count due to academic requirements.
Potential Changes on the Horizon
Some say the NCAA might just give everyone a blanket fifth year, but so far, that’s just talk. There’s no official rule change yet.
With all these lawsuits and appeals, it’s anyone’s guess how the NCAA’s eligibility rules will look in a few years. Players and schools are left waiting, and honestly, it’s a mess.
Conclusion
NCAA eligibility rules? Honestly, they’re confusing right now. Legal challenges and inconsistencies pop up everywhere.
Players like Kaedin Robinson, Rahsul Faison, and Cortez Braham Jr. feel stuck. They’re not sure what comes next for their college football careers.
If you’re curious and want the details, check out the full article on CBS Sports.
Book Your Dream Vacation Today
Flights | Hotels | Vacation Rentals | Rental Cars | Experiences
- Schools Covered
- College Football Articles
- Men's College Basketball Articles
- Men's College Soccer Articles
- Women's College Basketball Articles
- Olympic Athlete Articles
- Men's College Baseball Articles
- College Sports Media Professionals Articles
- Hall of Fame Member Articles
- Former College Player Articles
- Game Previews
