Zach Calzada’s NIL Money Flash Sparks Controversy After Kentucky Benching

BOOK AWAY GAME TRAVEL NOW!
Flights | Hotels | Vacation Rentals | Rental Cars | Experiences

College athletics just keep changing, don’t they? The whole Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) thing has opened up a world of chances and, honestly, a fair share of headaches too.

Take Zach Calzada, for example. He’s the Kentucky Wildcats quarterback who transferred from Incarnate Word and was supposed to be a game-changer.

People expected a lot from Calzada. He’d made a name for himself at Texas A&M, especially after that wild win over Alabama.

When he landed at Kentucky, he was immediately named the starting quarterback. The Wildcats, coming off a pretty rough 4-8 season, pinned a lot of their hopes on him.

There was a real buzz around his arrival. Calzada’s experience and flashes of brilliance made him look like the missing piece for Kentucky.

The school went all-in, making a big NIL offer to get him on board. You could feel the optimism in the air.

But things didn’t exactly go as planned. Calzada struggled on the field, and it showed.

Pro Football Focus (PFF) stats aren’t kind: out of 179 quarterbacks with at least 50 dropbacks, Calzada ranks 174th in passing grade. Ouch.

Advertisement
Advertisement

His most memorable moment so far? A clip of him on the sidelines, mouthing, *what the (fudge) is going on*—which, honestly, said it all.

Then there’s the off-field stuff. Not long ago, a video of Calzada surfaced online, and it blew up fast.

In it, he’s flashing wads of $100 bills and taunting a guy named Garrett. The backlash was immediate and fierce.

That video’s done some real damage:

  • Public Perception: Calzada’s reputation has taken a hit, and it’s hard to imagine any pro team looking past this.
  • Program Reputation: Kentucky’s football program and Coach Mark Stoops are feeling the heat, especially with the team already struggling.
  • Booster Reactions: The boosters who put money into Calzada’s NIL deal? They’re probably second-guessing that investment right about now.

No one really knows if Calzada was sober in the video, but his actions have sparked plenty of rumors. It’s a messy situation that’s got people questioning how NIL money is affecting young athletes.

Still, there’s a faint silver lining for Kentucky. After the Calzada experiment, the team’s turned to redshirt freshman Cutter Boley, a former four-star recruit.

Boley’s stepped up in a big way. He recently led the Wildcats to their first SEC win of the year, beating Auburn on the road.

That win has given fans at least a little hope. Maybe there’s something to build on here.

As the season rolls on, Kentucky’s got some soul-searching to do. The Calzada saga is a lesson, and it might just push the program to rethink how it handles NIL deals and recruiting.

Conclusion

The Zach Calzada saga really throws a spotlight on the unpredictable side of the NIL era in college sports. Sure, NIL deals can open a lot of doors for athletes, but they’re not without their pitfalls.

It’s a tricky balance. Sometimes these deals end up affecting not just the player, but the whole program. Kentucky’s got to find a way to shake things off and look ahead.

Maybe they’ll lean on the potential of guys like Cutter Boley. Hopefully, they’ll take a few lessons from all this and keep moving forward.

BOOK AWAY GAME TRAVEL NOW!
Find the best accommodations
Check availability at 5* hotels, guest houses and apartments rated "superb" or "exceptional" by visitors just like you.
NO RESERVATION FEES
CHECK AVAILABILITY FOR YOUR DATES HERE
 

If you want to dig into more details, check out the full article on Sports Illustrated.

Joe Hughes
Joe Hughes is the founder of CollegeNetWorth.com, a comprehensive resource on college athletes' earnings potential in the NIL era. Combining his passion for sports with expertise in collegiate athletics, Joe provides valuable insights for athletes, fans, and institutions navigating this new landscape.

    Additional Reading:
Advertisement
Advertisement
Scroll to Top