Release NIL Files for Transparency in College Sports Payments

BOOK AWAY GAME TRAVEL NOW!
Flights | Hotels | Vacation Rentals | Rental Cars | Experiences

The landscape of college athletics is shifting fast with the rise of Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) deals. Extra Points, a sports news outlet, has been digging into the messiness of NIL transparency, especially in non-revenue sports.

This post looks at the potential of NIL deals, why financial transparency is so tough, and what it all means for athletes and institutions.

The Promise of NIL: A Game-Changer for All Athletes

NIL opportunities could seriously shake up college sports. Suddenly, athletes in every sport have a shot at earning money from their talents.

Platforms like FanSpark are leading the way. Their model is simple: athletes post exclusive content for fans, get 80% of the revenue, and keep total control over their brand and image.

This is a big deal for athletes in Olympic and non-revenue sports, who usually get left out of the NIL conversation.

How FanSpark Works

Here’s what FanSpark does:

  • Athletes post exclusive social content for their fans
  • Fans and alumni pay a monthly subscription for that content
  • Athletes get 80% of the revenue, FanSpark gets 20%
  • Athletes retain full ownership and control over their content, brand, and image

They skip direct messages, pay-per-view, betting, and tips. It’s just sports content, pure and simple. That’s a breath of fresh air for a lot of athletes.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The Struggle for Transparency in NIL Deals

Still, transparency in NIL deals is a huge headache. Extra Points has filed a bunch of open records requests for financial info—athlete payments, revenue sharing, contracts, all of it.

But most schools aren’t exactly eager to share. They cite FERPA, trade secrets, or competitive harm clauses to keep things under wraps.

Challenges in Obtaining Financial Data

A few schools, like the University of Kentucky and the University of Colorado, have shared basic numbers. In the first three months of the House revenue-share era, Kentucky made 98 payments totaling $1,486,099.20. Colorado? 262 payments, $7,672,052.88.

Other schools, like Texas A&M and Wisconsin, say they don’t have any records that fit the bill. It makes you wonder about their compliance with the NCAA’s updated financial reporting rules.

The Importance of Transparency for Athletes

Transparency in NIL deals isn’t just a nice-to-have. It’s key for making sure opportunities and treatment are fair—especially between men’s and women’s sports, as Title IX requires.

Without it, there’s no way to know if female athletes are really getting a fair shake. Plus, transparency helps all athletes understand their deals and make smarter choices.

Benefits of Public Financial Disclosures

Public disclosures can lead to:

  • Smarter negotiations
  • Fairer treatment for female athletes
  • Better market efficiency
  • Less power for behind-the-scenes rumors

It also lets athletes see what others are earning at different schools. That’s got to help level the playing field, right?

Arguments Against Financial Transparency

Of course, not everyone’s on board. Some argue that revealing pay could open athletes up to harassment from fans or gambling interests.

But is that enough reason to keep everything hidden? Maybe not. Limiting disclosures to data that can’t be traced to individual athletes might be a decent compromise for now.

Competitive Harm vs. Public Interest

Schools often say that sharing financial info causes “competitive harm.” But if that’s really a worry, why are coach and vendor contracts public?

Coaches get poached all the time, and vendor contracts reveal competitive pricing. Yet, those disclosures are allowed because they serve the public, taxpayers, and the university community.

BOOK AWAY GAME TRAVEL NOW!
Find the best accommodations
Check availability at 5* hotels, guest houses and apartments rated "superb" or "exceptional" by visitors just like you.
NO RESERVATION FEES
CHECK AVAILABILITY FOR YOUR DATES HERE
 

The Need for a Transparent NIL Ecosystem

Transparency in NIL deals isn’t just about ticking boxes for compliance or satisfying open records laws. It’s also about building a fairer, smarter, and more balanced market for everyone involved.

When schools and athletes actually know what’s going on, they can handle NIL deals with a lot more confidence. That means fewer surprises and, hopefully, more people getting what they deserve in this new chapter for college sports.

If you want to really dig into the details of NIL transparency and what it might mean, check out the full article on Extra Points here.

Joe Hughes
Joe Hughes is the founder of CollegeNetWorth.com, a comprehensive resource on college athletes' earnings potential in the NIL era. Combining his passion for sports with expertise in collegiate athletics, Joe provides valuable insights for athletes, fans, and institutions navigating this new landscape.

    Additional Reading:
Advertisement
Advertisement
Scroll to Top