The College Sports Commission (CSC) is making some big moves to enforce new rules around Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL), plus revenue-sharing in college sports. But honestly, things have gotten a bit tangled—legal pushback and hesitation from certain universities are slowing everything down.
Some key folks in the CSC, along with a handful of university presidents, are still pushing hard for everyone to get on board. They’re hoping that a wider embrace of the agreement will help college athletics stay stable and fair—or at least more so than it’s been lately.
The CSC’s New Enforcement Body
The CSC’s launch feels like a turning point for college sports. Their main goal? Oversee and enforce those tricky NIL and revenue-sharing rules that keep causing headaches.
Bryan Seeley, the CSC’s Chief Operating Officer, has been vocal about the need for schools to sign a participant agreement. He thinks this is the key to making investigations and enforcement actually work, not just look good on paper.
He’s convinced that sticking to this agreement will make the whole enforcement system stronger. It’s a big ask, but he’s not backing down.
Support from University Presidents
Presidents from Arizona, Washington, Virginia Tech, and Georgia have stepped up in support. They put out a letter urging their colleagues to sign, stressing how much stability and compliance matter right now.
This kind of public backing could really help the CSC’s push for broader buy-in. It’s not everything, but it’s something.
Legal Hurdles and State Opposition
Of course, nothing’s ever simple. Legal challenges are popping up, making things messy.
The general counsel at Texas Tech, for example, told their school not to sign, worried it might clash with state laws. Texas Tech booster Cody Campbell and the Texas Attorney General agreed, telling all Texas schools to steer clear.
Attorneys general from Tennessee and West Virginia have also raised eyebrows at the agreement’s legality. That’s more than a speed bump—it’s a real complication for the CSC.
Impact on the Agreement’s Progress
All this legal wrangling has pretty much stalled the agreement for now. The Big 12’s legal team is talking with the Texas Attorney General’s office, trying to hammer out a version that works.
Seeley says he’s open to some feedback and possible tweaks, but he’s wary of any changes that might water down what the agreement is supposed to do.
The Importance of a Strong Participant Agreement
Still, Seeley’s holding out hope that most schools will sign in the end. He keeps saying that a strong participant agreement is necessary if college sports are going to tackle their biggest issues.
This agreement is part of a much bigger plan—a new system where schools pay athletes directly, following that $2.8 billion lawsuit settlement. It’s a lot to take in, honestly.
Challenges and the Need for Collective Action
Leaders in college sports have been asking for federal help to back up the settlement rules and offer some antitrust protection. But with the SCORE Act stalling in the U.S. House of Representatives, those hopes are looking pretty slim.
Seeley’s stance? At the end of the day, it’s up to the schools to fix what’s broken. He’s urging the ones who believe in strong enforcement to speak up and encourage others to sign on. Maybe that’s what it’ll take.
Conclusion
The CSC’s push to enforce NIL and revenue-sharing rules has hit a pretty pivotal moment. There’s a lot of support for the participant agreement, but legal battles and some states pushing back have slowed things down.
If you’re curious and want to dig deeper, you can check out the full article on the New York Times.
- Schools Covered
- College Football Articles
- Men's College Basketball Articles
- Men's College Soccer Articles
- Women's College Basketball Articles
- Olympic Athlete Articles
- Men's College Baseball Articles
- College Sports Media Professionals Articles
- Hall of Fame Member Articles
- Former College Player Articles
- Game Previews
