In a landmark decision, a U.S. district judge has dismissed a lawsuit alleging that former Michigan football players lost potential earnings from their names, images, and likenesses (NIL) during their collegiate careers.
This case, filed in September 2024, drew plenty of attention to the ongoing debate about NIL rights and college athlete compensation.
The plaintiffs—Braylon Edwards, Denard Robinson, Mike Martin, and Shawn Crable—claimed they were wrongfully denied the chance to profit from their NIL, a practice that’s now accepted in college sports.
But the court sided with the defendants, including the NCAA, Big Ten Network, and Big Ten Conference, saying the claims were “time-barred.”
Even after this setback, the players’ attorney, Jim Acho, says he plans to appeal, which could mean this legal fight is just getting started.
The Background of the Lawsuit
The lawsuit was led by former Michigan football players who argued that they were unfairly prevented from making money off their NIL while at the university.
They said the NCAA and its affiliates had long made money from using players’ names, images, and likenesses without paying them. That, they argued, was a pretty clear antitrust injury that left athletes at a disadvantage.
The Plaintiffs and Their Claims
Among the plaintiffs were some of the most recognizable names in Michigan football history:
- Braylon Edwards
- Denard Robinson
- Mike Martin
- Shawn Crable
These former players listed 20 examples of compensatory damages they believed they were owed, including:
- Lost market value of their NIL rights
- Suppressed earnings from endorsements
- Missed opportunities for media appearances
- Use of likeness in merchandise
- Archived footage and highlight reels
- Lost licensing opportunities
The Defendants’ Argument
The NCAA, Big Ten Network, and Big Ten Conference filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit in January, arguing the claims were *time-barred*.
Basically, they said the statute of limitations had long since run out. On Friday, U.S. District Judge Terrence Berg agreed and granted the motion to dismiss.
Legal Precedents and Implications
While current athletes can now profit from their NIL, thanks to recent changes in NCAA policy, this ruling highlights the legal hurdles for former athletes seeking retroactive compensation.
The judge’s decision to dismiss the case because it was time-barred really underscores how important it is for legal action to happen in a timely way.
The Road Ahead: An Appeal in the Works
Despite the dismissal, attorney Jim Acho, who represents the players, has said he’s confident in their position and plans to appeal.
Acho, who’s had success in similar cases (including the NFL concussion lawsuits), thinks the appellate process could change things. “Sometimes you need to go through the appellate process to get justice,” he said—so maybe this fight isn’t over yet.
Potential Outcomes and Impact
If the appeal works out, it could set a big precedent for former college athletes looking for compensation for their NIL.
That kind of ruling might open the floodgates for similar lawsuits nationwide, possibly leading to major settlements for former athletes. On the other hand, if the dismissal stands, it could discourage others from bringing similar cases, making retroactive NIL compensation even tougher to win.
Broader Implications for College Athletics
This case is just one part of a bigger push for college athletes’ rights.
The NIL compensation debate has picked up a lot of steam lately, leading to some big changes in NCAA policy. But retroactive compensation? That’s still a thorny issue, and plenty of former athletes feel like they got a raw deal under the old rules.
The Evolution of NIL Rights
The NCAA’s recent changes allowing current athletes to profit from their NIL mark a pretty major shift in college sports.
These changes came about because more people started to realize just how much value athletes add to their schools and the wider sports world. Still, what to do for former athletes who played before the rule change? That question’s not going away anytime soon.
The dismissal of this lawsuit is a big moment in the debate over NIL rights and compensation in college sports.
While the ruling is a setback for the plaintiffs, there’s talk of an appeal that could shake things up. The legal fight isn’t over, and honestly, who knows where it’ll land?
The broader impact on college athletics and the rights of former athletes is still hanging in the air. It’s an issue that keeps coming back, and it’s not going away anytime soon.
For more details on this case, check out the original article on CBS News Detroit.
- Schools Covered
- College Football Articles
- Men's College Basketball Articles
- Men's College Soccer Articles
- Women's College Basketball Articles
- Olympic Athlete Articles
- Men's College Baseball Articles
- College Sports Media Professionals Articles
- Hall of Fame Member Articles
- Former College Player Articles
- Game Previews
