Honoring Steroid Era Figures in MLB: A Controversial Decision

BOOK AWAY GAME TRAVEL NOW!
Flights | Hotels | Vacation Rentals | Rental Cars | Experiences

The New York Post recently dove into the hot-button topic of honoring athletes from the steroid era. The article pokes at the moral and ethical messiness of celebrating sports figures tainted by performance-enhancing drugs.

As fans and history buffs, we’ve got to wrestle with the complexities here. What exactly do we do with players whose achievements and mistakes are tangled up together?

The steroid era—mostly the late ‘80s through the early 2000s—brought some wild athletic highs and shattered records. But, let’s be honest, PEDs cast a long shadow over those feats.

Especially in baseball, steroids became almost part of the game’s identity. That’s a weird legacy to grapple with.

There’s no denying the era was thrilling. Fans got a show—power, speed, endurance, the works.

Remember the 1998 home run race between Mark McGwire and Sammy Sosa? That summer felt electric, and it pulled a lot of folks back to baseball. Still, the PED cloud hung over it all, making everyone question what was real.

The Ethical Dilemma

One big argument against honoring these athletes? It’s the ethical mess. Celebrating them could look like we’re okay with cheating, which chips away at the soul of sports.

Critics say putting these players in halls of fame might tell kids that winning at any cost is fine. That’s a slippery slope, isn’t it?

PEDs didn’t just boost stats—they made things unfair for the clean players. That’s a tough pill to swallow if you played by the rules.

BOOK AWAY GAME TRAVEL NOW!
Find the best accommodations
Check availability at 5* hotels, guest houses and apartments rated "superb" or "exceptional" by visitors just like you.
NO RESERVATION FEES
CHECK AVAILABILITY FOR YOUR DATES HERE
 

Arguments for Recognition

Despite all that, some folks say we can’t just ignore what these athletes did. The steroid era is baked into sports history, for better or worse.

If we pretend it didn’t happen, we’re not telling the whole story. And honestly, isn’t that kind of dishonest too?

Plenty argue that since PED use was so widespread, most top players probably used them. So, in a weird way, the playing field was kind of even—at least among the elite.

Maybe we should judge those records in context, not by today’s standards. That’s a fair point, even if it’s uncomfortable.

Contextualizing Achievements

Some people push for context instead of outright celebration. They say you can recognize what these athletes did without giving them a free pass.

Why not use their stories to teach fans and young athletes about how complicated that era was? Sports aren’t black and white, and this is a good example.

Others point out that it wasn’t just the players’ fault. Sports organizations dropped the ball too—testing was weak, and the culture rewarded winning above all else.

So, maybe the blame gets spread around. The story isn’t simple, and maybe that’s okay.

The Path Forward

There’s no easy fix for how to handle the legacy of steroid-era stars. People keep arguing, and honestly, I don’t see that changing soon.

Advertisement
Advertisement


Comprehensive Histories

Maybe the best move is to tell the whole story, warts and all. Don’t hide the achievements, but don’t gloss over the controversies either.

That way, future generations get the full picture. Maybe they’ll learn something about integrity—and temptation—along the way.

Conditional Recognition

Another idea? Offer recognition, but with strings attached. Acknowledge the records, but add context—maybe a note about PED involvement on a plaque or in the record books.

It’s not perfect, but it’s honest. We can appreciate the athleticism without pretending everything was above board. That feels like a decent compromise, at least for now.

Conclusion

The debate over honoring athletes from the steroid era is honestly a tangled mess. Ethical questions, shifting standards, and the weight of history all crash together here.

There’s never going to be a perfect answer. Still, if we want to make sense of it, we’ve got to look at both the achievements and the messiness of that era.

If you want to dig deeper into this whole conundrum, check out the New York Post’s take: It’s completely preposterous to honor these faces of the steroid era.

Joe Hughes

Book Your Dream Vacation Today
Flights | Hotels | Vacation Rentals | Rental Cars | Experiences

Joe Hughes is the founder of CollegeNetWorth.com, a comprehensive resource on college athletes' earnings potential in the NIL era. Combining his passion for sports with expertise in collegiate athletics, Joe provides valuable insights for athletes, fans, and institutions navigating this new landscape.

    Additional Reading:
Shop the Amazon.com Fan Shop and Fanatics Shop for gear from your favorite teams! Support our site at no cost to you.
Scroll to Top