The landscape of high school sports in Ohio is shifting fast. A Franklin County judge has temporarily blocked the Ohio High School Athletic Association (OHSAA) from enforcing its ban on Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) deals.
This decision cracks the door open for high school athletes to make money from sponsorships and endorsements. Suddenly, Ohio’s policies are more in line with what most other states are doing.
The ruling follows a lawsuit filed by the family of Jamier Brown, Ohio’s top-ranked wide receiver recruit. They argued the ban was unfair and held athletes back from economic opportunities.
The Evolution of NIL in High School Sports
NIL deals have exploded onto the student athletics scene in the last few years. Athletes can now profit from their personal brand, landing sponsorships and endorsements based on their popularity.
Most states have jumped on board with this trend. But Ohio’s been dragging its feet, sticking with a ban on NIL deals for high schoolers.
The lawsuit in Columbus has pushed this issue into the spotlight. It’s challenging the OHSAA’s position and fighting for student athletes to earn money for their talents.
This case has drawn plenty of attention and put a spotlight on the uneven playing field across state lines when it comes to NIL rules.
The Case of Jamier Brown
Jamier Brown’s family kicked off the lawsuit that led to the temporary restraining order. He’s a junior at Wayne High School and the top wide receiver recruit in Ohio.
Brown has verbally committed to Ohio State and is considered one of the nation’s best high school athletes. His family says the NIL ban stops him from benefiting from his athletic skills and leaves Ohio lagging behind.
Their attorney, Luke Fedlam, argued that athletes like Brown are missing out on thousands of dollars. He mentioned that some families have even left Ohio or picked sports outside OHSAA’s control just to chase endorsement opportunities.
This has created different classes of student athletes, depending on who can actually get paid.
Legal Arguments and Implications
In court, OHSAA attorney Joe Fraley pointed to the U.S. Supreme Court’s NCAA v. Alston decision. That case clarified that being an amateur doesn’t mean student athletes lose their economic rights.
This is part of a bigger legal trend, as courts seem more willing to acknowledge student athletes’ right to make money.
Future of NIL Regulations in Ohio
The temporary restraining order is a win for those in favor of NIL deals. Still, the future of NIL rules in Ohio is up in the air.
OHSAA says member schools might vote on new NIL language in May. The lawsuit could push that timeline up, though.
Back in 2022, Ohio schools voted to keep the NIL ban. Now, with the lawsuit and judge’s ruling, there’s definitely more momentum for change.
Impact on High School Athletes and Families
The chance to land NIL deals can mean a lot for high school athletes and their families. For some, it’s a way to help pay for training, travel, and other expenses that come with competing.
There’s also the exposure and experience that comes with endorsements. Athletes can build their personal brand and get noticed outside their hometowns.
This kind of visibility can be huge for those hoping to play in college or go pro someday. It’s not just about the money—it’s about building a future.
Broader Implications for High School Sports
Lifting the NIL ban in Ohio, even temporarily, could send ripples through high school sports everywhere. Other states might start rethinking their own rules.
States like Michigan, Indiana, Wyoming, Hawaii, Alabama, and Mississippi still ban NIL deals. If they change course, student athletes across the country could finally be on a more even playing field.
Conclusion
A Franklin County judge just put a pause on the OHSAA’s ban against NIL deals for high school athletes. This is a pretty big moment for Ohio sports, honestly.
Now, Ohio joins most other states, letting young athletes actually earn something from their name, image, and likeness. It feels like a long-overdue nod to their rights—not everyone will agree, but it’s hard to ignore the shift.
The case isn’t over, though. What happens next could ripple out far beyond Ohio, maybe even nudging other states to rethink their own policies.
If you want the full story, check out the article on Sports Illustrated.
- Schools Covered
- College Football Articles
- Men's College Basketball Articles
- Men's College Soccer Articles
- Women's College Basketball Articles
- Olympic Athlete Articles
- Men's College Baseball Articles
- College Sports Media Professionals Articles
- Hall of Fame Member Articles
- Former College Player Articles
- Game Previews
