Ohio Lawmakers Push to Ban NIL Deals in High School Sports

BOOK AWAY GAME TRAVEL NOW!
Flights | Hotels | Vacation Rentals | Rental Cars | Experiences

In a surprising twist, Ohio lawmakers are pushing for a ban on Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) deals for middle and high school athletes.

This comes just months after the Ohio High School Athletic Association (OHSAA) approved an emergency bylaw in November, letting young athletes earn money through endorsements, social media, personal merchandise, camps, and other commercial gigs.

Some folks argue NIL agreements could harm students. Others think these opportunities are essential for young athletes.

Let’s wade into the complicated world of NIL in Ohio high schools, the arguments swirling around the proposed ban, and what all this could mean for the future of high school sports in the state.

The Current State of NIL in Ohio High Schools

In November 2025, Ohio became the 45th state to let high school athletes make money off their names, images, and likenesses.

This decision landed with a mix of excitement and skepticism.

The emergency bylaw from OHSAA allowed student-athletes to jump into a bunch of commercial activities, including:

Advertisement
Advertisement
  • Endorsements
  • Social media posts
  • Personal merchandise
  • Sports camps

It was supposed to level the playing field, giving Ohio’s young athletes a shot at the same perks their peers in other states already had.

But now, lawmakers are considering a bill that could ban NIL deals for middle and high schoolers altogether.

Arguments for the Proposed Ban

Supporters of the ban say NIL agreements can be risky for young athletes. They’ve got a few main reasons.

Financial Responsibility

One big worry is that students just aren’t ready to handle the money and responsibility that comes with NIL deals.

High-dollar contracts with companies could lead to mistakes, or even let others take advantage of them.

Focus on Academics and Sports

There’s also the argument that NIL deals could distract students from what really matters: school and sports.

Juggling endorsements and business stuff might pull their attention away from learning and playing.

Fairness and Equality

Not every student gets the same shot at NIL deals, and that could cause tension or unfairness within teams and schools.

Arguments Against the Proposed Ban

On the flip side, critics of the ban say NIL opportunities are vital for young athletes. Here’s why they think so.

Financial Opportunities

NIL deals can mean real money for student-athletes, helping out their families or even paying for college.

For some, it’s not just a bonus—it’s a lifeline.

Real-World Experience

Handling NIL agreements gives students a crash course in business, marketing, and managing their own finances.

BOOK AWAY GAME TRAVEL NOW!
Find the best accommodations
Check availability at 5* hotels, guest houses and apartments rated "superb" or "exceptional" by visitors just like you.
NO RESERVATION FEES
CHECK AVAILABILITY FOR YOUR DATES HERE
 

That kind of experience can pay off big down the road, no matter what they do next.

Leveling the Playing Field

Letting Ohio athletes do NIL deals keeps them on par with kids in other states.

Honestly, it could make a difference in keeping talented athletes from leaving Ohio just to chase those opportunities elsewhere.

Impact on High School Sports

If the ban goes through, it could shake up high school sports in Ohio in a few big ways.

Recruitment and Retention

Ohio might have a tough time keeping top athletic talent if NIL deals disappear.

Athletes could start looking for schools in other states that let them profit from their skills.

Competitive Balance

The ban could mess with the competitive balance, too.

Schools with deeper pockets may still find ways to help their athletes, while others might fall behind.

Future Opportunities

For a lot of student-athletes, high school is just the first step toward college or even pro sports.

NIL deals can open doors, giving them exposure and chances they might otherwise miss out on.

Conclusion

The whole NIL debate in Ohio high schools? It’s a tangle, honestly. You’ve got reasonable points coming from both camps.

Some folks want the ban because they’re worried about teenagers handling money, losing focus, or things getting unfair. Others, though, think NIL deals are a chance for young athletes to earn, learn, and maybe even get ahead in the game.

Lawmakers are weighing all this as they consider the ban. Whatever happens, it’s going to shape the future for student-athletes in Ohio, for better or worse.

Curious for more details? Check out the original article on Cleveland.com.

Joe Hughes
Joe Hughes is the founder of CollegeNetWorth.com, a comprehensive resource on college athletes' earnings potential in the NIL era. Combining his passion for sports with expertise in collegiate athletics, Joe provides valuable insights for athletes, fans, and institutions navigating this new landscape.

    Additional Reading:
Advertisement
Advertisement
Scroll to Top