Virginia Tech Halts Revenue Payments to Player Requesting Redshirt, Attorney Claims

BOOK AWAY GAME TRAVEL NOW!
Flights | Hotels | Vacation Rentals | Rental Cars | Experiences

Virginia Tech has landed in the middle of a controversy after suspending revenue share payments to a football player who wanted to redshirt this season. The player’s attorney, Darren Heitner, says this situation highlights just how tricky and unpredictable college sports have become, especially with new name, image, and likeness (NIL) agreements in play.

The player, who hasn’t been named, went to interim head coach Phillip Montgomery and asked to redshirt. After that, the school took him off the football roster and immediately stopped his revenue share payments.

Heitner says the university told the player to return all university property. The school’s letter also accused the player of opting out and committing fraud, which Heitner strongly rejects.

Virginia Tech’s Controversial Decision

The trouble started when the player reached out to Coach Montgomery about redshirting. Instead of supporting the request, the university responded harshly.

Heitner claims the player was removed from the roster, lost his guaranteed payments, and was told to give back university gear. The university insists the player opted out, but Heitner says that’s just not true.

Legal Implications and Heitner’s Defense

Darren Heitner, a well-known sports attorney, is representing the player. He argues that simply asking to redshirt doesn’t break any revenue sharing agreement.

Heitner points out that the player didn’t opt out, threaten anyone, or say he wanted to transfer. The request was just about redshirting, not leaving the school.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Heitner finds the university’s actions unfair and possibly illegal. He says the revenue share agreement doesn’t let the school withhold money if a player redshirts.

Revenue sharing in college sports only started in July, so everyone’s still figuring out the rules.

The Broader Context of Revenue Sharing in College Sports

This Virginia Tech incident fits into a bigger debate about how revenue sharing and NIL deals work in college sports. The NCAA has always stopped schools from pulling scholarships, but now schools can withhold income, which creates new headaches.

Some schools have already run into legal trouble over how they handle these agreements.

The NCAA’s Position

A source at the NCAA says redshirting decisions usually happen between the player and coach at the campus level. The NCAA doesn’t get involved with individual revenue sharing contracts.

This lack of oversight means disputes like this one can get messy fast. Many contracts let schools take back money if a player enters the transfer portal, but here, the player hasn’t asked to transfer.

Heitner argues that just asking to redshirt shouldn’t be enough for the school to end the revenue share deal.

Potential Legal Ramifications

Heitner says his client might sue if they can’t work things out with Virginia Tech. This case could set a big precedent for how these agreements get enforced in college sports.

It’s still not clear who’s really in charge of regulating these deals, since both the NCAA and the College Sports Commission say it’s up to each school.

Impact on Players and Universities

The result here could affect a lot of players and schools. Players need to read their revenue sharing agreements carefully and know what they’re getting into.

Universities, on the other hand, should probably rethink their policies and make sure they’re fair and legally sound. It’s a cautionary tale, honestly.

Virginia Tech isn’t the only school dealing with these headaches. Other programs are running into similar problems, especially after midseason coaching changes.

BOOK AWAY GAME TRAVEL NOW!
Find the best accommodations
Check availability at 5* hotels, guest houses and apartments rated "superb" or "exceptional" by visitors just like you.
NO RESERVATION FEES
CHECK AVAILABILITY FOR YOUR DATES HERE
 

At another school, a player refused to enter a game after the head coach was fired, hoping to keep his redshirt eligibility. It just goes to show how complicated managing player eligibility and revenue sharing has gotten.

Conclusion

The controversy at Virginia Tech highlights just how messy revenue sharing and NIL agreements can get in college sports. Players and universities now face a maze of legal and ethical questions.

Who really knows where this will all lead? The outcome here might shape how future deals work, for better or worse.

If you want to dig deeper, check out the full article on CBS Sports at this link.

Joe Hughes
Joe Hughes is the founder of CollegeNetWorth.com, a comprehensive resource on college athletes' earnings potential in the NIL era. Combining his passion for sports with expertise in collegiate athletics, Joe provides valuable insights for athletes, fans, and institutions navigating this new landscape.

    Additional Reading:
Advertisement
Advertisement
Scroll to Top